Swift, M. J., Heal, O. W. & Anderson, J. M. Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems (Blackwell Scientific, 1979).
Carter, D. O., Yellowlees, D. & Tibbett, M. Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 94, 12–24 (2007).
Google Scholar
Wagg, C., Schlaeppi, K., Banerjee, S., Kuramae, E. E. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. Fungal–bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nat. Commun. 10, 4841 (2019).
Google Scholar
Schroeter, S. A. et al. Microbial community functioning during plant litter decomposition. Sci. Rep. 12, 7451 (2022).
Google Scholar
Strickland, M. S., Lauber, C., Fierer, N. & Bradford, M. A. Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition. Ecology 90, 441–451 (2009).
Google Scholar
Metcalf, J. L. et al. Microbial community assembly and metabolic function during mammalian corpse decomposition. Science 351, 158–162 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pechal, J. L. et al. The potential use of bacterial community succession in forensics as described by high throughput metagenomic sequencing. Int. J. Leg. Med. 128, 193–205 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R. & Milo, R. The biomass distribution on Earth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6506–6511 (2018).
Google Scholar
Parmenter, R. R. & MacMahon, J. A. Carrion decomposition and nutrient cycling in a semiarid shrub–steppe ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 79, 637–661 (2009).
Google Scholar
Barton, P. S., Cunningham, S. A., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Manning, A. D. The role of carrion in maintaining biodiversity and ecological processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia 171, 761–772 (2013).
Google Scholar
Barton, P. S. et al. Towards quantifying carrion biomass in ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 950–961 (2019).
Google Scholar
Putman, R. J. Flow of energy and organic matter from a carcase during decomposition: decomposition of small mammal carrion in temperate systems 2. Oikos 31, 58–68 (1978).
Google Scholar
DeVault, T. L., Brisbin, I. L. Jr & Rhodes, O. E. Jr Factors influencing the acquisition of rodent carrion by vertebrate scavengers and decomposers. Can. J. Zool. 82, 502–509 (2004).
Google Scholar
Aneja, M. K. et al. Microbial colonization of beech and spruce litter—influence of decomposition site and plant litter species on the diversity of microbial community. Microb. Ecol. 52, 127–135 (2006).
Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. et al. Network analysis reveals functional redundancy and keystone taxa amongst bacterial and fungal communities during organic matter decomposition in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 188–198 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dangerfield, C. R., Frehner, E. H., Buechley, E. R., Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. & Brazelton, W. J. Succession of bacterial communities on carrion is independent of vertebrate scavengers. PeerJ 8, e9307 (2020).
Google Scholar
Johnson, H. R. et al. A machine learning approach for using the postmortem skin microbiome to estimate the postmortem interval. PLoS ONE 11, e0167370 (2016).
Google Scholar
Metcalf, J. L. et al. A microbial clock provides an accurate estimate of the postmortem interval in a mouse model system. eLife 2, e01104 (2013).
Google Scholar
Singh, B. et al. Temporal and spatial impact of human cadaver decomposition on soil bacterial and arthropod community structure and function. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2616 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hong, E. S., Bang, S. H., Kim, Y.-H. & Min, J. Treatment of livestock carcasses in soil using Corynebacterium glutamicum and lysosomal application to livestock burial. Environ. Health Toxicol. 33, e2018009 (2018).
Google Scholar
Fey, S. B. et al. Recent shifts in the occurrence, cause, and magnitude of animal mass mortality events. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1083–1088 (2015).
Google Scholar
Metcalf, J. L. Estimating the postmortem interval using microbes: knowledge gaps and a path to technology adoption. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 38, 211–218 (2019).
Google Scholar
Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 5, 180214 (2018).
Google Scholar
Weiss, S., Carter, D. O., Metcalf, J. L. & Knight, R. Carcass mass has little influence on the structure of gravesoil microbial communities. Int. J. Leg. Med. 130, 253–263 (2015).
Google Scholar
Carter, D. O., Metcalf, J. L., Bibat, A. & Knight, R. Seasonal variation of postmortem microbial communities. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 11, 202–207 (2015).
Google Scholar
Shukla, S. P. et al. Microbiome-assisted carrion preservation aids larval development in a burying beetle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 11274–11279 (2018).
Google Scholar
Megyesi, M. S., Nawrocki, S. P. & Haskell, N. H. Using accumulated degree-days to estimate the postmortem interval from decomposed human remains. J. Forensic Sci. 50, 618–626 (2005).
Google Scholar
Connor, M., Baigent, C. & Hansen, E. S. Measuring desiccation using qualitative changes: a step toward determining regional decomposition sequences. J. Forensic Sci. 64, 1004–1011 (2019).
Google Scholar
Towne, E. G. Prairie vegetation and soil nutrient responses to ungulate carcasses. Oecologia 122, 232–239 (2000).
Google Scholar
Vass, A. A., Bass, W. M., Wolt, J. D., Foss, J. E. & Ammons, J. T. Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution. J. Forensic Sci. 37, 1236–1253 (1992).
Google Scholar
Coe, M. The decomposition of elephant carcases in the Tsavo (East) National Park, Kenya. J. Arid Environ. 1, 71–86 (1978).
Google Scholar
Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K. & Paul, E. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 988–995 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gralka, M., Szabo, R., Stocker, R. & Cordero, O. X. Trophic interactions and the drivers of microbial community assembly. Curr. Biol. 30, R1176–R1188 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zelezniak, A. et al. Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6449–6454 (2015).
Google Scholar
Machado, D. et al. Polarization of microbial communities between competitive and cooperative metabolism. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 195–203 (2021).
Google Scholar
DeBruyn, J. M. et al. Comparative decomposition of humans and pigs: soil biogeochemistry, microbial activity and metabolomic profiles. Front. Microbiol. 11, 608856 (2020).
Google Scholar
Keenan, S. W., Schaeffer, S. M., Jin, V. L. & DeBruyn, J. M. Mortality hotspots: nitrogen cycling in forest soils during vertebrate decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 121, 165–176 (2018).
Google Scholar
Carbonero, F., Benefiel, A. C., Alizadeh-Ghamsari, A. H. & Gaskins, H. R. Microbial pathways in colonic sulfur metabolism and links with health and disease. Front. Physiol. 3, 448 (2012).
Google Scholar
Parr, W. R. G. J. Water Potential Relations in Soil Microbiology (Soil Science Society of America, 1981).
Stark, J. M. & Firestone, M. K. Mechanisms for soil moisture effects on activity of nitrifying bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 218–221 (1995).
Google Scholar
Manzoni, S., Taylor, P., Richter, A., Porporato, A. & Ågren, G. I. Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol. 196, 79–91 (2012).
Google Scholar
Martino, C. et al. A novel sparse compositional technique reveals microbial perturbations. mSystems 4, e00016–e00019 (2019).
Google Scholar
Drobish, A. M. et al. Oblitimonas alkaliphila gen. nov., sp. nov., in the family Pseudomonadaceae, recovered from a historical collection of previously unidentified clinical strains. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 3063–3070 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ashe, E. C., Comeau, A. M., Zejdlik, K. & O’Connell, S. P. Characterization of bacterial community dynamics of the human mouth throughout decomposition via metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, and culturing techniques. Front. Microbiol. 12, 689493 (2021).
Google Scholar
Dong, N. et al. Prevalence, transmission, and molecular epidemiology of tet(X)-positive bacteria among humans, animals, and environmental niches in China: an epidemiological, and genomic-based study. Sci. Total Environ. 818, 151767 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cobaugh, K. L., Schaeffer, S. M. & DeBruyn, J. M. Functional and structural succession of soil microbial communities below decomposing human cadavers. PLoS ONE 10, e0130201 (2015).
Google Scholar
Keenan, S. W. et al. Spatial impacts of a multi-individual grave on microbial and microfaunal communities and soil biogeochemistry. PLoS ONE 13, e0208845 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tomberlin, J. K. et al. Interkingdom responses of flies to bacteria mediated by fly physiology and bacterial quorum sensing. Anim. Behav. 84, 1449–1456 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shi, Z. et al. Putrescine is an intraspecies and interkingdom cell–cell communication signal modulating the virulence of Dickeya zeae. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1950 (2019).
Google Scholar
Valdés-Santiago, L. & Ruiz-Herrera, J. Stress and polyamine metabolism in fungi. Front. Chem. 1, 42 (2013).
Google Scholar
Tofalo, R., Cocchi, S. & Suzzi, G. Polyamines and gut microbiota. Front. Nutr. 6, 16 (2019).
Google Scholar
Challacombe, J. F. et al. Genomes and secretomes of Ascomycota fungi reveal diverse functions in plant biomass decomposition and pathogenesis. BMC Genomics 20, 976 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fu, X. et al. Fungal succession during mammalian cadaver decomposition and potential forensic implications. Sci. Rep. 9, 12907 (2019).
Google Scholar
Fierer, N. et al. Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21390–21395 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dini-Andreote, F., Stegen, J. C., van Elsas, J. D. & Salles, J. F. Disentangling mechanisms that mediate the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in microbial succession. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1326–E1332 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J. & Ning, D. Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 (2017).
Zhou, J. et al. Stochasticity, succession, and environmental perturbations in a fluidic ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E836–E845 (2014).
Google Scholar
Waring, B., Gee, A., Liang, G. & Adkins, S. A quantitative analysis of microbial community structure–function relationships in plant litter decay. iScience 25, 104523 (2022).
Google Scholar
Aerts, R. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79, 439–449 (1997).
Google Scholar
Purahong, W. et al. Life in leaf litter: novel insights into community dynamics of bacteria and fungi during litter decomposition. Mol. Ecol. 25, 4059–4074 (2016).
Google Scholar
Pechal, J. L., Crippen, T. L., Cammack, J. A., Tomberlin, J. K. & Benbow, M. E. Microbial communities of salmon resource subsidies and associated necrophagous consumers during decomposition: potential of cross-ecosystem microbial dispersal. Food Webs 19, e00114 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hyde, E. R., Haarmann, D. P., Petrosino, J. F., Lynne, A. M. & Bucheli, S. R. Initial insights into bacterial succession during human decomposition. Int. J. Leg. Med. 129, 661–671 (2015).
Google Scholar
Vogel, H. et al. The digestive and defensive basis of carcass utilization by the burying beetle and its microbiota. Nat. Commun. 8, 15186 (2017).
Google Scholar
Deel, H. L. et al. The microbiome of fly organs and fly–human microbial transfer during decomposition. Forensic Sci. Int. 340, 111425 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mason, A. R. et al. Body mass index (BMI) impacts soil chemical and microbial response to human decomposition. mSphere 7, e0032522 (2022).
Google Scholar
Burkepile, D. E. et al. Chemically mediated competition between microbes and animals: microbes as consumers in food webs. Ecology 87, 2821–2831 (2006).
Google Scholar
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624 (2012).
Google Scholar
Walters, W. et al. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00009-15 (2016).
Thompson, L. R. et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551, 457–463 (2017).
Google Scholar
Amaral-Zettler, L. A., McCliment, E. A., Ducklow, H. W. & Huse, S. M. A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PLoS ONE 4, e6372 (2009).
Google Scholar
Sanders, J. G. et al. Optimizing sequencing protocols for leaderboard metagenomics by combining long and short reads. Genome Biol. 20, 226 (2019).
Google Scholar
Glenn, T. C. et al. Adapterama I: universal stubs and primers for 384 unique dual-indexed or 147,456 combinatorially-indexed Illumina libraries (iTru & iNext). PeerJ 7, e7755 (2019).
Google Scholar
Didion, J. P., Martin, M. & Collins, F. S. Atropos: specific, sensitive, and speedy trimming of sequencing reads. PeerJ 5, e3720 (2017).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wang, M. et al. Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 828–837 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W. et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis Chemical Analysis Working Group (CAWG) Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI). Metabolomics 3, 211–221 (2007).
Google Scholar
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Google Scholar
Amir, A. et al. Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns. mSystems 2, e00191-16 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6, 90 (2018).
Google Scholar
Robeson, M. S. 2nd et al. RESCRIPt: reproducible sequence taxonomy reference database management. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1009581 (2021).
Google Scholar
Janssen, S. et al. Phylogenetic placement of exact amplicon sequences improves associations with clinical information. mSystems 3, e00021-18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kruskal, W. H. & Wallis, W. A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621 (1952).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. Associating microbiome composition with environmental covariates using generalized UniFrac distances. Bioinformatics 28, 2106–2113 (2012).
Google Scholar
Anderson, M. J. A new method for non‐parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46 (2001).
Wickham, H. Ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 3, 180–185 (2011).
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Pirrung, M., Gonzalez, A. & Knight, R. EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data. Gigascience 2, 16 (2013).
Google Scholar
McDonald, D. et al. American Gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome research. mSystems 3, e00031-18 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kodama, W. A. et al. Trace evidence potential in postmortem skin microbiomes: from death scene to morgue. J. Forensic Sci. 64, 791–798 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gonzalez, A. et al. Qiita: rapid, web-enabled microbiome meta-analysis. Nat. Methods 15, 796–798 (2018).
Google Scholar
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar
Kluyver, T. et al. in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (eds Loizides, F. & Scmidt, B.) 87–90 (IOS Press, 2016).
Stegen, J. C. et al. Quantifying community assembly processes and identifying features that impose them. ISME J. 7, 2069–2079 (2013).
Google Scholar
Stegen, J. C., Lin, X., Fredrickson, J. K. & Konopka, A. E. Estimating and mapping ecological processes influencing microbial community assembly. Front. Microbiol. 6, 370 (2015).
Google Scholar
Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Google Scholar
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).
Google Scholar
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883–8900 (2020).
Google Scholar
Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gower, J. C. Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40, 33–51 (1975).
Google Scholar
Jackson, D. A. PROTEST: a PROcrustean Randomization TEST of community environment concordance. Écoscience 2, 297–303 (1995).
Peres-Neto, P. R. & Jackson, D. A. How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia 129, 169–178 (2001).
Google Scholar
Machado, D., Andrejev, S., Tramontano, M. & Patil, K. R. Fast automated reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic models for microbial species and communities. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 7542–7553 (2018).
Google Scholar
Heirendt, L. et al. Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0. Nat. Protoc. 14, 639–702 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bittinger, K. et al. Bacterial colonization reprograms the neonatal gut metabolome. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 838–847 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chan, S. H. J., Simons, M. N. & Maranas, C. D. SteadyCom: predicting microbial abundances while ensuring community stability. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005539 (2017).
Google Scholar
Nothias, L.-F. et al. Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment. Nat. Methods 17, 905–908 (2020).
Google Scholar
Pluskal, T., Castillo, S., Villar-Briones, A. & Oresic, M. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 395 (2010).
Google Scholar
Dührkop, K. et al. SIRIUS 4: a rapid tool for turning tandem mass spectra into metabolite structure information. Nat. Methods 16, 299–302 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ludwig, M. et al. Database-independent molecular formula annotation using Gibbs sampling through ZODIAC. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 629–641 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kim, S., Kramer, R. W. & Hatcher, P. G. Graphical method for analysis of ultrahigh-resolution broadband mass spectra of natural organic matter, the van Krevelen diagram. Anal. Chem. 75, 5336–5344 (2003).
Google Scholar
Boye, K. et al. Thermodynamically controlled preservation of organic carbon in floodplains. Nat. Geosci. 10, 415–419 (2017).
Google Scholar
van den Berg, R. A., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Westerhuis, J. A., Smilde, A. K. & van der Werf, M. J. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 7, 142 (2006).
Google Scholar
Lin, H. & Peddada, S. D. Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction. Nat. Commun. 11, 3514 (2020).
Google Scholar
Keshavan, R. H., Montanari, A. & Oh, S. Matrix completion from a few entries. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 56, 2980–2998 (2010).
Google Scholar
Fedarko, M. W. et al. Visualizing ’omic feature rankings and log-ratios using Qurro. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 2, lqaa023 (2020).
Google Scholar
Martino, C. et al. Context-aware dimensionality reduction deconvolutes gut microbial community dynamics. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 165–168 (2021).
Google Scholar
McDonald, D. et al. redbiom: a rapid sample discovery and feature characterization system. mSystems 4, e00215–e00219 (2019).
Google Scholar
McDonald, D. et al. Greengenes2 unifies microbial data in a single reference tree. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01845-1 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cantrell, K. et al. EMPress enables tree-guided, interactive, and exploratory analyses of multi-omic data sets. mSystems 6, e01216–e01220 (2021).
Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G. & Gramfort, A. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
+ There are no comments
Add yours