2024 NFL Draft consensus Big Board:

As the 2024 NFL Draft class continues to take shape, it’s time again to take stock of which prospects are dominating the early-round conversation.

The Athletic’s consensus Big Board combines rankings from a wide range of draft experts to identify how the top prospects are viewed relative to the rest of their class. In theory, by the time we reach the draft weekend, these rankings should help give us a handle on how the picks could (or, at least, should) play out.

Let’s see how things have shifted since our January board …

2024 NFL Draft Consensus Board

PlayerPositionSchoolLastChange

1

Caleb Williams

QB

2

1

2

Marvin Harrison Jr.

WR

1

-1

3

Drake Maye

QB

3

0

4

Brock Bowers

TE

5

1

5

Joe Alt

OT

4

-1

6

Rome Odunze

WR

8

2

7

Olu Fashanu

OT

6

-1

8

Malik Nabers

WR

7

-1

9

Dallas Turner

EDGE

9

0

10

Jayden Daniels

QB

10

0

11

Jared Verse

EDGE

13

2

12

JC Latham

OT

11

-1

13

Laiatu Latu

EDGE

12

-1

14

Taliese Fuaga

OT/G

20

6

15

Terrion Arnold

CB

19

4

16

Quinyon Mitchell

CB

28

12

17

Nate Wiggins

CB

14

-3

18

Amarius Mims

OT

17

-1

19

Byron Murphy II

DT

38

19

20

Cooper DeJean

CB

15

-5

21

Brian Thomas Jr.

WR

22

1

22

Kool-Aid McKinstry

CB

18

-4

23

Jer’Zhan Newton

DT

16

-7

24

Tyler Guyton

OT

37

13

25

Troy Fautanu

G

26

1

26

J.J. McCarthy

QB

31

5

27

Keon Coleman

WR

21

-6

28

Chop Robinson

EDGE

25

-3

29

Jackson Powers-Johnson

C

47

18

30

Bo Nix

QB

27

-3

31

Ennis Rakestraw Jr.

CB

39

8

32

Graham Barton

OT/G

35

3

33

Adonai Mitchell

WR

32

-1

34

Troy Franklin

WR

33

-1

35

Jordan Morgan

OT

29

-6

36

Ladd McConkey

WR

43

7

37

Kamari Lassiter

CB

30

-7

38

Michael Penix Jr.

QB

24

-14

39

Xavier Worthy

WR

48

9

40

Edgerrin Cooper

LB

NR

NR

41

Ja’Tavion Sanders

TE

NR

NR

42

Chris Braswell

EDGE

42

0

43

Darius Robinson

Edge

NR

NR

44

Kingsley Suamataia

OT

34

-10

45

Zach Frazier

C

NR

NR

46

T’Vondre Sweat

DT

45

-1

47

Tyler Nubin

S

40

-7

48

Bralen Trice

EDGE

23

-25

49

Devontez Walker

WR

NR

NR

50

Kris Jenkins

DT

50

0

51

Payton Wilson

LB

NR

NR

52

Javon Bullard

S

NR

NR

53

Ja’Lynn Polk

WR

NR

NR

54

Kamren Kinchens

S

36

-18

55

T.J. Tampa

CB

NR

NR

56

Patrick Paul

OT

49

-7

57

Calen Bullock

S

NR

NR

58

Adisa Isaac

EDGE

NR

NR

59

Xavier Legette

WR

46

-13

60

Jonathon Brooks

RB

NR

NR

61

Roman Wilson

WR

NR

NR

62

Malachi Corley

WR

NR

NR

63

Junior Colson

LB

NR

NR

64

Jaden Hicks

S

NR

NR

65

Jeremiah Trotter Jr.

LB

NR

NR

66

Cooper Beebe

G

NR

NR

67

Jonah Elliss

EDGE

NR

NR

68

Mike Sainristil

CB

NR

NR

69

Jermaine Burton

WR

NR

NR

70

Kalen King

CB

41

-29

71

Marshawn Kneeland

EDGE

NR

NR

72

Kiran Amegadjie

OT

NR

NR

73

Michael Hall Jr.

DT

NR

NR

74

Brandon Dorlus

DT

NR

NR

75

Blake Corum

RB

NR

NR

76

Ruke Orhorhoro

DT

NR

NR

77

Christian Haynes

G

NR

NR

78

Ricky Pearsall

WR

NR

NR

79

Leonard Taylor III

DT

44

-35

80

Braelon Allen

RB

NR

NR

81

Jalen McMillan

WR

NR

NR

82

Kris Abrams-Draine

CB

NR

NR

83

Sedrick Van Pran

C

NR

NR

84

Trey Benson

RB

NR

NR

85

Blake Fisher

OT

NR

NR

86

Braden Fiske

DT

NR

NR

87

Dominick Puni

G

NR

NR

88

Maason Smith

DL

NR

NR

89

Brenden Rice

WR

NR

NR

90

Cedric Gray

LB

NR

NR

91

McKinnley Jackson

DT

NR

NR

92

Javion Cohen

G

NR

NR

93

Christian Mahogany

G

NR

NR

94

Cam Hart

CB

NR

NR

95

Bucky Irving

RB

NR

NR

96

Cole Bishop

S

NR

NR

97

Johnny Wilson

WR

NR

NR

98

Khyree Jackson

CB

NR

NR

99

Zak Zinter

G

NR

NR

100

Josh Newton

CB

NR

NR

(Players shaded in red dropped 10 spots or more from the previous consensus board; players shaded in orange rose 10 spots or more, or joined the top 50 after being unranked.)

A few thoughts on the updated board from draft analyst Diante Lee:

1. It’s a great draft to need a true X receiver

Three times in the past decade (the 2015, ’20 and ’22 drafts), six receivers have been selected in Round 1. It might happen again — nine WRs currently rank in the top 40 of our consensus board.

The NFL has seen an influx of guys who can play in the slot or outside, but it’s rare to have so many highly touted players who project primarily as outside matchup problems. Marvin Harrison Jr. (No. 2 on the board) is an obvious one, but Brian Thomas Jr. (No. 21), Keon Coleman (No. 27) and Adonai Mitchell (No. 33) all are X-receiver types who can make their way into the first round.

Thomas is a small forward on turf who could run a 40 time in the 4.4s. Coleman’s production makes him a bit of an enigma, but he’s another impressive athlete with a wide catch radius and smooth movement skills for his height.

For Mitchell, we’ve waited his entire career — and are still waiting — to see him dominate the way his athletic profile suggests he can. But he high points the ball well, runs good routes and understands the nuances of creating separation at the catch point. He’s not as imposing as Tee Higgins, but he can pick on a mismatch over the top, especially on third downs and in the red zone.

Big bodies like Johnny Wilson and Brenden Rice likely will be available in Round 3.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

2024 NFL Draft Big Board: Who are the top 100 prospects in this year’s class?

2. On a few of the “rising” prospects …

The all-star preparation process is like a minicamp, so it’s hard to get a fair feel for prospects the way you can from their tape. For linemen, receivers and corners, though, the one-on-ones are good opportunities.

A few standouts on this consensus board:

Taliese Fuaga, OL, Oregon State: He comes in at No. 14, up six spots and trending toward the “blue-chip” OT prospects in this class — JC Latham, Olu Fashanu and Joe Alt. When you see Fuaga’s play strength and raw athletic traits, it’s clear why he’s a likely first-round pick. I still have some reservations about his hip mobility and balance in his pass sets in a way I don’t for the top three tackles (or Georgia’s Amarius Mims). Still, Fuaga is one of the draft’s best right tackles.

Quinyon Mitchell, CB, Toledo: When my most recent mock draft published after conference championship weekend, I knew that Mitchell was on the heels of this year’s top cornerbacks — but I still considered him in the 30-40 range. He had a strong Senior Bowl week playing press and proving that he has the hips and speed to go stride for stride with outside receivers, though, and lands at No. 16 here.

Mitchell’s name is hot right now, and that has helped push his stock ahead of corners I still think are better players — specifically, Cooper DeJean, Kool-Aid McKinstry and Nate Wiggins. But Mitchell is a deserved first-round talent himself. His aggression will be a plus for defenses that like to play match coverages, and there’s some potential to move him inside and out if the physicality is there. I can’t wait to see how he tests and where that leaves his stock.

Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon: Powers-Johnson is an interesting evaluation. He’s comfortably one of the top five interior linemen of this class, and the top center. He has above-average size for a center, and he moves better in pass protection than his weight suggests. He also appeared to clean up his footwork ahead of the Senior Bowl, because he didn’t have the same issues with setting too deep or too shallow — that’s why we saw more clips of him dumping guys in one-on-ones.

Still, I don’t see the kind of first-round prospect on tape that others do. When you compare Powers-Johnson to some of the centers who’ve been first-round picks (Tyler Linderbaum, Frank Ragnow, Travis Frederick), his explosiveness, agility and play strength might not quite clear that bar.

He’s still good, but I think his range belongs between picks 50-75. Ranking him ahead of guys like Graham Barton and Kingsley Suamataia is a step outside of my comfort zone.

3. The NFL has cooled on Michael Penix Jr. in the QB4 debate

A little more than a month since the college football season ended, sober-minded analysis can more appropriately distribute credit for Washington’s excellent offensive year among the receiving corps, the coaching staff and QB Michael Penix Jr.

Still, Penix (No. 38) himself is a tangled thread in an impossible-to-parse debate that also includes Bo Nix (No. 30) and J.J. McCarthy (No. 26) as the “best of the rest” options at quarterback.

In Nix and Penix, we see known commodities with a half-decade’s worth of starts under their belts. Nix has received praise for trimming the fat out of his game and being wise with the ball, though I’d argue much of that success was manufactured by how quickly Oregon tried to get the ball out of his hands. Penix also was smart with the ball and good at throwing accurately against tight man coverage.

Athletically, Nix’s legs allow him to escape rushers or use bootlegs to stress underneath coverage defenders, while Penix prefers to keep his feet planted in the pocket. The latter is better at recognizing coverage before and after the snap. Both QBs appear to be coachable and willing to play strictly within the design, which is why I expect coaches running a Shanahan-style offense to take interest in them.

McCarthy is interesting because we hear a lot of arguments advocating for him in Round 1. Through one ear, you’ll hear him praised as a “winner” — you can argue whether or not wins should be a QB stat, but they carry weight for some. Through the other ear, you’ll hear about how his impressive tools and high ceiling are waiting to be unleashed in an offense that asks more of him as a passer.

Personally, I just don’t think there’s enough tape to support the latter — especially not as a top-30 pick.

I see a decent athlete in McCarthy, but one closer to Zach Wilson, Sam Howell, Baker Mayfield or Brock Purdy than a game-breaking type. He’s willing to take a hit to deliver the ball, but his navigation of muddy pockets is spotty at best, and I don’t think he’s comfortable extending plays unless he’s rolling to his right. When it comes to his raw arm talent, he can make every NFL throw, but he’s more meeting the baseline than exceeding it.

4. Will a CB separate from the pack at the combine?

The cluster of Arnold, Wiggins, DeJean, and McKinstry have played musical chairs for the top cornerback spot — and Mitchell is a late entrant. I’m excited to see how these guys test during the combine and pro-day circuit.

Right now, I’m willing to cast my lot on the guy I think will outperform the others: DeJean. In my mind, he is the best overall athlete of this group, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he registers the best jumps and 40 times among the top CBs.

Also keep an eye on Kamari Lassiter (No. 37), Khyree Jackson (No. 98) and Josh Newton (No. 100) as potential rookie-year starters. They have pretty complete skill sets, and showing out at the combine would go a long way for each of them.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

2024 NFL Mock Draft: After Super Bowl LVIII, how could the first three rounds look?

5. It’s a sad state of affairs at the RB position

There already have been two drafts in the last 10 years without a first-round running back, but this class has generated the lowest level of interest that I can remember.

In fairness, it’s light on quality options. Jonathon Brooks (No. 60) is the highest-ranked RB, and he’s still recovering from a late-season knee injury. When he’s healthy, he can be a leading force for a running game and provide value as a receiver out of the backfield. Trey Benson (No. 84) can be a home-run threat in an outside zone scheme. Braelon Allen (No. 80) can do just about everything you want a back to do — and he’s still one of the draft’s youngest prospects. Still, you’d be hard-pressed to find many conversations about what these guys can bring to an offense.

This isn’t some kind of death knell for the position, as a pair of RBs were first-rounders last year and the guys mentioned above can be immediate contributors. This position is in the same spot as interior linemen and linebackers in the 2024 draft class, though, if not behind them. We might not see a running back picked in the top 50 — and maybe not in the top two rounds, period.

(Top photos of Taliese Fuaga and Michael Penix Jr.: Chris Coduto / Getty Images; Michael Wade / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)

You May Also Like

More From Author

+ There are no comments

Add yours